ࡱ>  bjbjcTcT ;>>~::}}}}}8]`&  (111   -`/`/`/`/`/`/`beJ/`Q}     /`}}11`t#t#t# l}1}1-`t# -`t#t#j]W\1`CxY2``0`KYJe0 ed\\e}\p  t#     /`/`!   `    e         : C: Agenda Board of Regents Facilities and Land Management Committee Thursday, April 15, 2010; *1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Bristol Bay Campus University of 91ֱFairbanks Dillingham, Alaska *Times for meetings are subject to modifications within the April 15-16, 2010 timeframe. Committee Members: Timothy Brady, Committee Chair Robert Martin Carl Marrs, Committee Vice Chair Kirk Wickersham Mary K. Hughes Cynthia Henry, Board Chair I. Call to Order II. Adoption of Agenda MOTION "The Facilities and Land Management Committee adopts the agenda as presented. I. Call to Order II. Adoption of Agenda Full Board Consent Agenda Project Approval UAF Campus Wide NCRR Recovery Act Construction Grant New Business Project Approval UAA MatSu Campus HVAC/Boiler and Exhaust Fan Replacement V. Ongoing Issues A. Update on UAF Skarland Hall Shower Room Renovation Update on UAF Critical Electrical Distribution System C. Update on UAF Utilities Planning D. Update on UAF Master Plan E. Update on UAA Community Campus Master Plans F. IT Report to include IT Security G. Construction in Progress VI. Future Agenda Items VII. Adjourn This motion is effective April 15, 2010." III. Full Board Consent Agenda A. Project Approval - UAF Campus Wide NCRR Recovery Act Construction Grant Reference 10 The President recommends that: MOTION The Facilities and Land Management Committee recommends that the Board of Regents approve the Formal Project Approval request for the University of 91ֱFairbanks Campus Wide NCRR Recovery Act Construction Grant project as presented, and authorizes the university administration to proceed through schematic design not to exceed a Total Project Cost of $7,530,000. This motion is effective April 15, 2010. POLICY CITATION In accordance with Regents Policy 05.12.042, Formal Project Approval (FPA) represents approval of the Project including the program justification and need, scope, the Total Project Cost (TPC), and funding plan for the project. It also represents authorization to complete the development of the project through the schematic design, targeting the approved scope and budget, unless otherwise designated by the approval authority. A FPA is required for all projects with an estimated TPC in excess of $2.5 million in order for that projects inclusion of construction funding to be included in the Universitys capital budget request, unless otherwise approved by the Board. The level of approval required shall be based upon TPC as follows: TPC > $4 million will require approval by the Board based on recommendations from the Facilities and Land Management Committee (F&LMC). TPC > $2 million but d" $4 million will require approval by the F&LMC. TPC > $1 million but d" $2 million will require approval by the Chairperson of the F&LMC. TPC d" $1 million will require approval by the universitys Chief Finance Officer (CFO) or designee. RATIONALE AND RECOMMENDATION On March 31, 2010, Dr. Buck Sharpton received notification that the grant for this project has been awarded to UAF. Project Scope: The Campus Wide National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Recovery Act Construction Grant project will renovate and create space at the Fairbanks and Bethel Campuses of the University of 91ֱFairbanks in support of research aimed at the behavioral and nutritional sciences of Alaskas native peoples. UAF has been, and continues to be, a world leader in these research fields, and the project will advance the Universitys capacity, as well as support meaningful partnerships with UAF and community leaders. The project is a result of a recently approved grant from the National Institutes of Health funded through the NCRR Recovery Act of 2009. The Center for 91ֱNative Health Research (CANHR) conducts health disparities research in partnership with Yupik Eskimo communities in rural Southwest Alaska. The University of 91ֱFairbanks (UAF), on behalf of CANHR, proposes to renovate empty space in the Arctic Health Research Building (AHRB) in Fairbanks to add 2,000 square feet of finished space devoted to biomedical research, and another 1,800 square feet of finished space on the Kuskokwim Campus in Bethel, Alaska. The increased space will positively impact CANHRs ability to conduct more clinically-oriented research at UAF, and to communicate regularly with the rural 91ֱNative research partners and participants in the region. It will significantly increase healthcare jobs in one of the most economically depressed minority communities in the state and nation. At the Arctic Health Research Building, the project will provide a net of 4,000 gross square feet (2,000 finished, 2,000 shell) of program space in the existing courtyard area to create an integrated clinical and nutritional assessment suite directed at research to understand and eliminate health disparities among Yupik Eskimos. The new space will be designed to accommodate Telehealth medicine (secure video conferencing) and distance education video conferencing. The project will also affect another 2,000 square feet of existing office and vending space that is directly adjacent to the new clinic. The shell space is for a future Neurosciences Lab that NIH will possibly fund through a separate construction grant to finish the space. At the Kuskokwim Campus, the project will renovate 5,500 square feet of empty space (1,800 finished, remaining shell, and mechanical) in the existing Voc-Tech building to create a facility that parallels the AHRB renovation. It will increase participant engagement, create jobs and build research capacity in the Yukon Kuskokwim (YK) region. The new space will be designed to accommodate Telehealth medicine and distance education video conferencing. These renovated facilities will increase research on obesity and chronic diseases and other health disparities among an underserved community. It will enhance communication, dissemination of research results, translation from laboratory to community, and improve data collection. Variance Report: UAF intends to design and construct the work as two distinct projects after initial design is complete. Each project will have its own schedule based on construction logistics required for the location. Schematic Design Approval for each project will be requested per Regents Policy. Proposed Total Project Cost and Funding Source(s): This project has received funding from a single C06 grant from the National Institutes of Health funded by the NCRR Recovery Act of 2009. NIH C06 Grant from NCRR Recovery Act $7,530,000 Estimated Annual Maintenance and Operating Costs (O&M): Kuskokwim: There will be a negligible increase to the annual O&M cost of these existing facilities. Fairbanks: There will be an increase of the following for FY12 M&O and M&R cost based on 4,000 gsf new space: Utilities $23,800 Trash and Grounds $2,100 Custodial $9,700 M&R $56,000 Total: $91,600 Consultants: The consulting firms of Design 91ֱ(Fairbanks) and Bezek Durst Seiser (Kuskokwim) assisted the university with the development of the grant application documents. A new consultant will be selected through a public Request for Proposals for the actual design of the projects. Other Cost Considerations: No other cost considerations. All cost for design, construction, and construction management are covered in the CO6 grant. The grant funding expires five years after the Notice to Proceed. Receipt authority would be requested from the State of 91ֱin April 2010. Backfill Plan: Not Applicable Schedule for Completion: Fairbanks Campus Project DESIGN Conceptual Design October 2009 Formal Project Approval April 2010 Schematic Design August 2010 Schematic Design Approval September 2010 Construction Documents April 2011 BID & AWARD Advertise and Bid April 2011 Construction Contract Award May 2011 CONSTRUCTION Start of Construction May 2011 Date of Beneficial Occupancy January 2012 Kuskokwim Campus Project DESIGN Conceptual Design October 2009 Formal Project Approval April 2010 Schematic Design August 2010 Schematic Design Approval September 2010 Construction Documents May 2011 BID & AWARD Advertise and Bid October 2011 Construction Contract Award November 2011 CONSTRUCTION Start of Construction December 2011 Date of Beneficial Occupancy December 2012 Procurement Method for Construction: UAF intends to utilize traditional Design-Bid-Build procurement for both projects. Affirmation: This project complies with Regents Policy, the campus master plans, and the agreement between the university and the National Institutes of Health. The Project Agreement is included without all signatures, which are expected to be available at the meeting. Action Requested Approval to develop the project documents through schematic design. Supporting Documents One Page Budget Project Agreement Concept Floor Plans IV. New Business A. Project Approval UAA MatSu Campus HVAC/Boiler and Exhaust Fan Replacement Reference 11 The President recommends that: MOTION The Facilities and Land Management Committee approves the Formal Project Approval request for the University of 91ֱAnchorage Mat-Su Campus HVAC, Boiler and Exhaust Fan Replacement as presented in compliance with the campus master plan, and authorizes the university administration to proceed through Schematic Design not to exceed a total project cost of $2,440,000. This motion is effective April 15, 2010. POLICY CITATION In accordance with Regents Policy 05.12.042, Formal Project Approval (FPA) represents approval of the Project including the program justification and need, scope, the Total Project Cost (TPC), and funding plan for the project. It also represents authorization to complete the development of the project through the schematic design, targeting the approved scope and budget, unless otherwise designated by the approval authority. An FPA is required for all projects with an estimated TPC in excess of $2.5 million in order for that projects inclusion of construction funding to be included in the universitys capital budget request, unless otherwise approved by the Board. The level of approval required shall be based upon TPC as follows: TPC > $4 million will require approval by the Board based on recommendations from the Facilities and Land Management Committee (F&LMC). TPC > $2 million but d" $4 million will require approval by the F&LMC. TPC > $1 million but d" $2 million will require approval by the Chairperson of the F&LMC. TPC d" $1 million will require approval by the university s Chief Finance Officer (CFO) or designee. RATIONALE AND RECOMMENDATION The current HVAC system in the Kerttula Building (JMK) is inadequate to meet air supply demands. Although the existing air handling unit was initially adequate to supply air to the original JMK building, several building additions have been made without additional air handling capacity to meet the increased load. In addition, there have been several remodels of the space within the building that have impacted the original design of the system. A new rooftop air handling unit (AHU) is required to meet demand. Due to ceiling restrictions, duct sizes cannot be increased, so a variable air volume (VAV) system will need to be installed in conjunction with the new AHU. The VAV system will need to be plumbed to the heating supply system, requiring new/more efficient boilers. Project Scope This project will provide a new rooftop mounted air handling unit, boilers, exhaust fans, and a Variable Air Volume (VAV) system to provide adequate air exchanges to meet current code requirements in MS101 - Jalmar M. Kerttula Building. Variance Report None Proposed Total Project Cost and Funding Source(s) FY11 Capital Request R&R #236 $2,440,000 Estimated Annual Maintenance and Operating Costs (O&M) No additional square footage, no additional O&M costs. Consultant(s) Mc Cool Carlson Green, RSA Engineering Other Cost Considerations None Backfill Plan None necessary. Schedule for Completion DESIGN Conceptual Design March 2010 Formal Project Approval April 2010 Schematic Design June 2010 Schematic Design Approval Dependent upon funding Construction Documents Dependent upon funding BID & AWARD Advertise and Bid Dependent upon funding Construction Contract Award Dependent upon funding CONSTRUCTION Start of Construction Dependent upon funding Date of Beneficial Occupancy Dependent upon funding Procurement Method for Construction: Publicly advertised, awarded to responsible low bidder. Design-Bid-Build. Affirmation: This project complies with Regents Policy, the draft campus master plan, and the project agreement. Action Requested: Approval to develop the project documents through schematic design. Supporting Documents: Proposed Project Budget V. Ongoing Issues A. Update on UAF Skarland Hall Shower Room Renovation Reference 12 Background: According to Regents Policy 05.12.043, this project is appropriately approved by the Facilities and Land Management Committee (FLMC) Chair now that the Total Project Cost (TPC) is reduced to $3,000,000. At Formal Project Approval, the request was presented to the FLMC because the TPC was just under the $4,000,000 approval level. Expected Action: The Schematic Design Approval request, as it will be presented to the Chair for approval, is contained in Reference 12. In the future, under these same conditions, it is the intent of the administration to inform the FLMC at the next board meeting after such an approval is granted unless directed otherwise. B. Update on UAF Critical Electric Distribution System Background: Five major deficiencies of the UAF electrical distribution system were identified in a report prepared by PDC Inc. Engineers in 2001. The report was commissioned in response to the near catastrophic power plant failure experienced in December 1998. The five deficiencies are: The capacity of the connection to GVEA is undersized. The UAF power plant switchboard short circuit rating is too small. The location and configuration of the UAF power plant switchboard is not appropriate and represents a major risk factor for the reliability of electricity and steam. The UAF electrical distribution system lacks redundancy typical for electrical utilities and necessary for annual and preventive maintenance work to be performed. Congestion in the utilidors makes expansion of the electrical distribution system extremely difficult. In order to address all of these problems, the report recommends that UAF move the campus distribution function out of the power plant and onto a new switchboard that is separate, but near the power plant. It also recommends the distribution voltage be increased from 4,160v to 12,470v. The recommended changes would increase reliability and capacity of the electrical distribution system as well as provide needed redundancy. Deficiencies 1 and 2 were partially remediated with the completion of the new connection to GVEA (Project No. 2004029 UTED) in September 2005. That project constructed a new substation for the connection to GVEA. The new transformer in the substation is currently operating at 4,160v but can easily be reconfigured to operate at the proposed higher voltage of 12,470v. The new substation solves the short circuit rating deficiency (Item No. 2). The new substation has the capacity to allow UAF to purchase enough power from GVEA to supply current and future loads in the event of a UAF power plant failure, but circuit breaker constraints in the UAF switchboard continue to limit the amount of electricity that could be purchased from GVEA to levels under current peak loads. The completion of the project was an important first step in renewal of the UAF electrical distribution system; however, if UAF were to experience a power plant failure, it would not be able to purchase 100% of its power from GVEA. This still represents a serious risk to UAF. The remainder of the work to implement the PDC recommendations can be done in three phases. Phase 1 is the construction of the switchboard, associated utilidors and conversion of one feeder to 12,470v. This would completely remediate Deficiencies No. 1 and 3 and partially remediate Deficiencies No. 4 and 5. Phases 2 and 3 are the progressive conversion of all of the distribution feeders to 12,470v, and this would completely remediate Deficiencies No. 4 and 5. The completion of all three phases of the project will provide UAF with an electrical distribution system that is more reliable, compliant with current electrical codes and utility standards, and is sized to accommodate future growth. Although the project was originally planned for three phases, the allocation of FY09 capital R&R appropriations required that Phase 1 be split into two phases, 1A and 1B. Only after both of these phases are completed will there be a functioning electrical system for at least one feeder. Phase 1A was completed in November 2009. The scope for this phase consisted of constructing 660 lineal feet of 8 ft. x8 ft. concrete utilidor and two large vaults for cable splicing. The utilidors will provide the ability to connect the existing electrical feeders to the new switchgear building that will be constructed in Phase 1B. The Phase 1A project scope also included an overall concept design for all phases of the project (1, 2, 3) and complete construction documents for Phase 1 (1A and 1B). The complete design was included in the Phase 1A scope to allow an efficient flow of construction work as additional funding for the subsequent phases was obtained. Formal Project Approval for Phase 1B this project was obtained on February 18, 2010 for a Total Project Cost of $10,000,000. Project Scope: The Phase 1B scope consists of constructing a new double breaker switchboard in a new building that is separate from the existing Atkinson Power Plant but located in close proximity to the plant and its associated utilidors. Phase 1B will also upgrade one feeder from 4,160v to 12,470v. The primary elements of the project are: A 50 ft. x110 ft. building with basement to house switchgear 12,470V double breaker switchgear Two 4,160V-12, 470V transformers to connect to existing generators 150 lineal feet of utilidor to connect to Phase 1A utilidor 550 lineal feet of ductbank to connect new building to GVEA substation Cable and switches needed to connect new switchgear to one existing feeder The building will be located on the same site as the proposed Energy Technology Center (ETC), and its location is coordinated with the ETC. The switchgear building will border a service courtyard where other outbuildings associated with the ETC are located. This will allow a common access for both projects. The exterior appearance of the ETC will be compatible with the exterior finishes proposed for the ETC and its associated outbuildings. Proposed Total Project Cost and Funding Source: The Total Project Cost approved with the Formal Project Approval request on February 18, 2010 was $10,000,000. The funding source is anticipated from the FY11 capital appropriation for R&R. Variance since Last Report to Board of Regents: The schematic design was received on February 1, 2010 and a cost estimate based on that design was received on March 2, 2010. The cost estimate was significantly over the anticipated construction costs from earlier estimates. A thorough review of the cost estimate is currently being performed. A preliminary analysis has identified that electrical equipment and material costs have escalated significantly in recent years. The Handy-Whitman Index (a specialized electrical cost index) shows a 67% electrical cost increase from 2004-2008. This rate of escalation outpaces the escalation rates applied to the 2001 estimate, which was used for developing this projects funding requests. Since this project is almost entirely electrical work, the higher rate of escalation has a greater impact for this project. The project team will be evaluating cost savings and value engineering options prior to developing the final budget and Total Project Cost. A thorough cost analysis of all remaining phases beyond phase one will be completed prior to submitting a request for schematic design approval and total project cost increase at the June 2010 Board of Regents meeting. Schedule: DESIGN (Note that Design services for phase 1B were contracted in Phase 1A) Phase 1B Schematic Design November 1, 2009 January 14, 2010 Phase 1 B Design Development January 14 February 18, 2010 Phase 1B Construction Documents February 18 March 25, 2010 Schematic Design Approval April 16, 2010 CM@R Contract Pricing March 25 April 23, 2010 CONSTRUCTION Early Start Construction (using Phase1A funds) April 23 July 15, 2010 Anticipated receipt of FY11 funds July 1, 2010 Phase 1B construction July 15, 2010 December 1, 2011 Supporting Documents: None C. Update on UAF Utilities Planning BACKGROUND The Utility Development Plan (UDP), completed in October 2006, was a comprehensive utilities planning effort involving the administrations of University of 91ֱ(UA) and University of 91ֱFairbanks (UAF) in addition to UAFs Facilities Services. The plan contained recommendations for utilities to support current and future campus needs with better reliability. The plan identified the following fundamental issues: Campus buildings and utility consumption growth beyond existing capacity Aging utility infrastructure Fuel supply/price risks UAF financial constraints The recommendations from the 2006 report are: In order to reliably serve all campus utility needs over the next twenty years, UAF must invest substantially in utility system capital asset renewal and utility infrastructure improvements almost immediately. The best long term utility strategy is renewal and expansion of the Atkinson Power Plant using coal as the preferred fuel. Subsequent to 2006, UAF found the only viable option to incorporate renewable energy into the Utilities Development Plan was to use biomass in the proposed high efficiency coal boiler. Heating Infrastructure Renewal (HIR) Working Group: At the direction of the Vice Chancellor for Administrative Services a working group has been established to re-evaluate the 2006 recommendations and consider new options. The circumstances and economics for coal, natural gas, and other alternative fuels have changed since 2006, and it is prudent to revisit our plan in light of current conditions. GLHN (the 2006 UDP consultant) has been hired to evaluate multiple options at a high level order of magnitude, and then to perform a detailed evaluation of two or three viable options. The process will include solicitation of input from industry, public, and the campus. Identifying alternatives, obtaining input, and selecting preferred options should be complete by April 30, 2010. An interim report is scheduled to be delivered the first week of May 2010. The in-depth review of options should be conducted during the summer of 2010, with draft recommendations available by August or September 2010. The preferred result of this work group is a recommendation that allows UAF to be prepared to efficiently and reliably heat and power the UAF campus for the next 40 years. The work done by the HIR Working Group should not affect the proposed utilities related R&R work that is requested in the FY11 Capital Request. The Critical Electrical Distribution Renewal Phase 1B 35% design documents with probable cost estimate submittals are in review by the University and the Design Consultants. HIR Working Group Update: Ten options were presented to local industry leaders and input on their viability was received. In general, the attendees were appreciative of being invited to advise UAF on the future of their combined heat and power plant. The meeting attendees have indicated they intend to provide written comments. The HIR Working Group is scheduling meetings with interested community environmental groups and fuel suppliers to obtain input on UAFs combined heat and power options. The meetings will be held in April 2010. UAF will focus further study on the most viable options based on preliminary economics and comments from the industry and community groups. More detailed analysis of these options will be completed by September 2010. FY11 Funding and Construction Plans: The FY11 R&R request contains three items related to UAF Utilities: Critical Electrical Distribution Renewal Phase 1B Connects GVEA and UAF generators - $10M+ Atkinson Heating Plant Critical Utilities Revitalization 16 separate items - $20.5M Atkinson Heating Plant Boiler and Turbine Replacement Design and permitting for $145M project - $5M It is anticipated that $16.6M from the FY11 R&R capital appropriation will be available for the UAF Utilities projects listed above. This assumption is based upon a total legislative appropriation of $100M of which UA would receive $37.5M and UAF would receive approximately $22M. The cost estimate for the Critical Electrical Distribution Renewal Phase 1B was received on March 2, 2010. The cost estimate was significantly over the anticipated costs, which were based on earlier estimates. The project team will also be evaluating cost savings and value engineering options prior to developing the final budget and Total Project Cost. A thorough cost analysis of all phases will be completed prior to submitting a request for schematic design approval and total project cost increase. It is anticipated that construction would start on this project summer 2010. Other Items from Past Updates: The U.S. Department of Energy is currently performing a feasibility study for a combined biomass and coal power plant for UAF. The study is also investigating a biomass gasification system that could be used by the UAF 91ֱCenter for Energy and Power for research purposes. The final report has been delayed until Department of Energy can obtain additional funding. The report was previously scheduled to be delivered in December 2009. D. Update on UAF Campus Master Plan The consultants, Perkins +Will, are continuing to write the supporting text of the Master Plan document while also incorporating regents comments into the plan. The Chancellors Cabinet, the Master Planning Committee and the Master Plan 2010 Working Committee are all heavily involved in the development of a master plan that will identify the current challenges, conditions and action items that will lead UAF in the future development of the UAF main campus. The consultants worked on campus the last two weeks of March 2010 to finalize the document and to meet with the Master Planning Committee, sub-committees and the chancellor as needed. The Master Plan 2010 Executive Summary and the Table of Contents, in addition to the short, mid and long term plans for Building Use, Open Space, and Parking and Circulation were presented to the Facilities and Land Management Committee in February 2010. Since then, the Table of Contents has been modified slightly to improve clarity. Chancellor Rogers will brief the committee on the status of the UAF Master Plan 2010 at the April 2010 Board of Regents meeting. A printed version of the draft plan is included for Facilities and Land Management Committee members to facilitate FLMC providing final comments to UAF at the April meeting. UAF looks forward to guidance and comments on the draft plan, and is focused on finalizing the plan by early May 2010. It remains UAFs intent to seek approval of the UAF Master Plan 2010 at the June 2010 Board of Regents meeting. E. Update on UAA Community Campus Master Plans Background: UAA community campuses do not currently have adopted Master Plans. After the 2004 approval of the UAA Campus Master Plan, UAA engaged ZGF to prepare the Master Plan for Kodiak College. A final draft of the Kodiak plan was completed prior to adoption of the new policy for master plans, but UAA has chosen to revise it to address changes in Kodiak administration and Regents Policy. Originally UAAs approach was to complete one community campus master plan and to use it as a template for the others. In early 2008, it became apparent that the community campuses desired to develop their own master plans sooner than such a process would permit. At that point, UAA engaged Anchorage-based Land Design North (LDN) to develop plans for the remaining community campuses (PWSCC, MATSU, and Kenai Peninsula College with 91ֱr). As a result, there are two formats: the ZGF plan for Kodiak College and the LDN plans for the other campuses. After board adoption of the new campus master plan policy, the strategy changed to seeking approval of the Community Campus plans after the Anchorage campus plan. During the summer of 2009, the community campus plans were reworked to incorporate the Fall 2008 policy. The plans now address the twelve required elements. Process: All of the Community Campus Master plans were collaboratively developed using an iterative process. The Project Manager and the Consultants met with the campus leadership, community members, staff, faculty and students for input. All plans document the campus mission and role in the UA system. The plans address the campus history and regional context and look at projected areas of sustainable growth. The plans document existing condition of the campus, incorporate the strategic and academic visions and conclude with recommendations for the campus future development. Status and Important Points for Consideration: --UAA Community campuses do not have adopted campus master plans and would benefit from having adopted plans. --All of the plans address the twelve elements required in Regents Policy to the degree possible. --Significant time and effort has been invested by staff and community leaders in developing the plans. The plans address the campus history and regional context looking at projected areas of sustainable growth; document existing condition of the campus; incorporate the institution, MAU and campus strategic and academic vision; and conclude with recommendations for the campus future development. --Campus plan development requires significant investment of staff and fiscal resources. These plans will be refined in the next update expected to begin in about 5 years. Schedule: At the December 2009 board meeting, the Cover, Table of Contents and Introduction for each of the current master plan drafts were included with the intent of providing a sense of the plan. UAA provided the final draft document for each campus on a thumb drive and in paper format to the Facilities & Land Management Committee at the February 17, 2010 meeting for review. On February 23, 2010, members of the Facilities and Land Management Committee met with UAA Community Campus Directors to hear from the Campus Directors their campus vision for short and longer term and how the Master Plans support institution and campus academic and strategic planning. After the presentations and discussion with directors, Committee Chair Brady offered that the committee would provide guidance at the April board meeting regarding any desired changes to the final draft plans. It remains UAAs intent to seek approval of the UAA community campus master plans at the June 2010 Board of Regents meeting. F. IT Report to include IT Security Reference 13 CITO Smith will provide an update on security status with university systems and update the committee on current issues of information technology across the university including compliance with new federal regulations. G. Construction in Progress Reference 14 Kit Duke, Chief Facilities Officer, and campus facilities representatives will update the committee regarding the ongoing investment in capital facilities and answer questions regarding the status report on active construction projects approved by the Boar@AIRSY\_eilrs    $ & 3 D F S T ^ t u ÿ|||˿ hk;hhk;h=xE5>*hk;h p`CJ]h p`hL]6CJ]hXe6CJ]h p`h p`6CJ] hMypCJ]h=xEh5h hk;h{0hMyphb\h~'hL]hXe hk;h=xEhNhk;h=xE5 h;h=xE0As  & T 1 2 $^a$gdI1$ !0^`0a$gdI1 $ !a$gdI1$a$gdI1gdI1$a$gdI1  2 C Y Z t   & ' f ~     ' * B C տΜΒ}αα}}shNh tE5\ h5\ h5\ hx5\hDh~'5\ h]5\ hZ5\ h5\ hD5\ hN5\ h55\hk;h=xE\ h~'5\hk;h=xE5\ h=xE5>*hk;h=xE5>* hk;h=xEhk;h=xE5-2 C Z t  ' ]  ' C \ $`a$gdI1$p0^p`0a$gd$p0^p`0a$gd~' $^a$gdI1 $ & Fa$gd~' $ & Fa$gdI1 $ & Fa$gdI1$0^`0a$gdI1 gdI1C D E H \ ] ^ _ i j s {  ùÚ~ytmcm^VNhk;h\hZh\ h\hh>*\ h>*\ h8V1\ h~'\hh]5>*\hEhE5h5h8V1 h=xE5h hN5h hXe5hhk;hXtM5hhk;h']y5hhk;h=xE5hhk;h=xE\hk;hc ?\ hVz\hk;hk;\h5hc ?5 hVz5h5h55\ i j   . / 6 $  ^a$gd8V1gd8V1$ !0^`0a$gd8V1^gdI1$  !0^`0a$gdI1^gdI1 $^a$gdI1 gdI1 ^`gdI1   / 6 8XYvw9YZQR7WP u !!!!!!"""ȹī㒲}h8V1h56B*ph h=h=h8V1h6B*phh8V1h\haa+ h=hZ~\ h=h h8V1h=h=hh8V1 h8V15h8V1h5h8V1h5>* h8V1hhk;h5hk;h\ haa+\16XZw$7$8$H$^a$gd8V1$  ^a$gd8V1gd8V1$ & F hp0^p`0a$gd8V1 $^a$gd8V1 !!"""""""_##### $$*$$ p^a$gd8V1$ !p^pa$gd" $^a$gdI1 $^a$gd8V1$7$8$H$^a$gd8V1"""Z"["n"""""""""$$+$6$7$8${$$P%Q%j%k%l%(&-&`&j&r&w&y&z&&&&&&&&&&&&&& ''''4'N']'u'''''ꫣh8V1h8V1hB*phh8V1h5h8V1h8V1>*h8V1h56B*phhaa+ h=h= h=hh8V1h>* hZ~\hZ~\hhZ~\ hZ~\hh"h= h8V1h:*$+$8$P%Q%l%y&z&&&&&&&&&'4']'''$ !^a$gd8V1 $^a$gdI1$ ^a$gd8V1$$$ h^a$gd8V1 $^a$gd8V1''''''')(*(C(K(j(((((()")L)M)Z)~))))"* $^a$gd8V1$ !^a$gd8V1''''(*(C(\(](j(((((((())")>)Z)p)~))))))"*#*$*/*0*1*L*T*u****4+5+F+++++++++h5>*;h_15\ hE5\h5h8V1hCJOJQJaJh8V1h5B*phh= hZ~\hZ~\h8V1h>* haa+>*hZ~\ hZ~\hh8V1B*phh8V1h5h8V1 h8V1h3"*$*1*4+5+F++++++++++F,G,f,g,n, .  !gd8V1$ !0^`0a$gdV> 0^`0gdI1^gdI1 $ & Fd`a$gd8V1 $^a$gd8V1+++,, ,,8,9,B,C,E,F,G,g,m,n,,,,,,, --S-s--- ..12d223 4Z4{ڔtogctth"hQD0h~'5 h"5 hQD0h~' h8V15\ hV>5\hQD0h~'5\]hQD0h~'5\hQD0h~'5>*h]h~'5>*h~'hV>hV>5\ h~'\ hV>;h~'\hZh~'\ h~'5\ hV>>*\ h~'>*\h]h~'\hb\5>*\% ...//00 11d2333 477+788$ ^a$gd8V1$$$ ^a$gd8V1gd8V1$ & Fp0^p`0a$gd" $^a$gd8V1$  !^a$gd8V1  !gd8V1Z4e47+78(8-8182838e8f8g8888888 94959O9S9U9c9r9t999999999999: :: :8:N:\:n:::::::::;%;&;';ᵔhQD0hV>] h8V15\hQD0h~']hQD0h~'6]h8V1hQD0h~'>*!hQD0h~'56B*\]phh"hQD0h~'5>*\hQD0h~'5\hQD0h~'>*\ hQD0h~'hV>:82838e8f88888 94959O9T9U9c9s9t999999$ !^a$gd8V1$ !^a$gd" $^a$gd8V1$$$ h^a$gd8V19 :O:\:::::&;';L;;;; < <<`<a<w<<<$0^`0a$gdI1 $^a$gd8V1$ hjP1$^a$gd8V1$ !^a$gd8V1';J;K;L;;;;;;;;<< < <<<<a<u<v<w<<<<<<<<<<<<<<zsle`XhZh~'\ h8V1\ hV>>*\ h~'>*\ h8V1>*\h]h~'\ h~'\ h8EN\h5>*\h5>*\ hb\5\hk;hf\hQD0h~']hV>h~'5\hQD0h~'5B*\phhQD0h~'6]hQD0h~'>*!hQD0h~'56B*\]ph hQD0h~'hV> hV>~'"<<<<<<@>B>S>?????@@A]AB$ & F p0^p`0a$gd$a$gdV> $^a$gd $^a$gd"$0^`0a$gd$ !0^`0a$gd" 0^`0gdI1<<<<<<<<===J=x===@>A>B>Q>R>S>>>>?????????@@@@#B;B[BBBB C CCCC DD=DUDDDDD1E=E۾ߙۙۙۙۙےۙۙۙۙۙ h@Vh~' h0y.h~'hk;h5 h~'>*\ hx>*\h]h~'\ h~'\ hV>5hh~'5h" hvqh~'h~'hV> hV>h~'hk;h~'5 hV>;h~'\9BB CCDDHHKKLLeOfOOOO=Q?Q|QQQR$ & Fp0^p`0a$gd" $^a$gd~' $^a$gd"$ & F p0^p`0a$gd=EDEPEvGGGGHHHHI5I^J~JKKKLLLLLL;N\NdOeOOOOOOOOOOOQnToTpTTTTTTTT7U;U_U`UUUUUVHVUV[V_VtVuVvVVVbWWWWXXX3XDXXXX/Y:Yh0y.h~'>* hV>hV> hV>h~'h" h0y.h" h0y.h~'h~'hV>RRdRRRoTpTT_U`UUuVvVXX-Z.Z8Z9Z@ZZZ$$ !^a$gd"$$ h^a$gd~' $^a$gd" $^a$gd~'$ & Fp0^p`0a$gd":YMYPYQYYYoYyYYYYYYYYY Z Z!Z,Z.Z6Z7Z8Z9ZZZZZZ[;[Q[d[e[[[[[[[[[\#\$\9\[\]\q\r\s\w\x\y\z\{\}\\\\\˼˪hk<h]5hk<hV>*\ hx>*<hk<\hk<h]\hk<h~'\h _ h0y.hV> hV>h~'hV>h"h~' h0y.h~'><hs>* hk<hshk<hs0J! hV>0J!hV>hs0J! hV>hs0J!CJOJQJaJ hk<hk<0J!CJOJQJaJhs0J!CJOJQJaJ hk<hs0J!CJOJQJaJ#hk<hsCJOJQJ\^JaJ#hk<hk<CJOJQJ\^JaJ"^^S^^^^^^___i`j`#a$aXabbeeeeUfVf $^a$gdk<$ & F^a$gdV>$ & F^a$gdV> $^a$gdk<Vfgg gPhQhii$j%jijjjjkNk$ & F ^ a$gdx$ & Fp^pa$gdx"$ & F ^ a$gdx"$ & F^`a$gdx"$ & F^a$gdk<"$  ^a$gdk< $^a$gdk< $^a$gdk<Nk|k}kllnnopppprrospsttuuv $^a$gdx$0^`0a$gdk< $^a$gdk< $^a$gdk< $p^pa$gdI1$ & F ^ a$gdxlllnnnnnopppppppppGqgqqrrｬyog_Z_SA#hk<hQD0CJOJQJ\^JaJ hk<hQD0 hV><hQD0\hk<hV5hk<hQD0>*\ hk<>*\ hx>*<hV\ hx\ hk<hV hk<hs0J!CJOJQJaJ hV>hs0J!CJOJQJaJ hV>x0!䴳ϴ<hs\ hk<hs#hk<hsCJOJQJ\^JaJ hk<hsCJOJQJ^JaJrr9sYspshtmtzt{ttttt%u*ugvlvmvovvvvvvvvwwwwwww x x&xxxxxxxxx(yͿͿ͸yuyuquqh]hV> hV>϶0<hx5 hV5\hk<hQD0>*\ hx>*<hV\ hx\ hk<hVhx hk<hQD0hxCJOJQJ^JaJ hk<hQD0CJOJQJ^JaJ#hk<hQD0CJOJQJ\^JaJhxCJOJQJ\^JaJ,vvwwwxxs{t{|||b~c~~deEF$0^`0a$gdk< $^a$gdk<(y)yyyzz{ {{{||||F}r}c~~~~~!FegˁӁԁ3;:K}҄ׄnɅ˅̅ÆĆІʶhk<hk<\ hk<\ h]\hk<hs>*\ hx\hk<hs\hk<hQD0>* hk<hxhQD0 h]hQD0hx hk<hQD0h]Bʅ˅ц҆^gdI1 0^`0gdI1$ G^a$gdI1$ !0^`0a$gdk<$0^`0a$gdI1$ !0^`0a$gdx$0^`0a$gdk<Іц҆҇ "KnqǽDzumu`umh0JCJmHnHuhV>0JCJjhV>0JCJUhV>hV>5CJ\ hV>䴳LL<h_1\hk<h_15\hk<h_15>*<hfr5\hk<hQ 5\hk<h]5>*<hb\5\hk<h tE5\U hk<h8EN hk<hs%d of Regents, implementation of recommendations by the external consultants, functional use survey, space utilization analysis, and other recent activity of note. This is an information and discussion item; no action is required. VI. Future Agenda Items VII. Adjourn     Agenda Facilities and Land Management Committee April 15, 2010 Dillingham, Alaska Facilities and Land Management Committee: Page  PAGE 3 of 17 Facilities and Land Management Committee: Page  PAGE 1 of 17 "KZmnopq^gdI1$a$hk<h_1\hLh0JCJmHnHuhV>0JCJjhV>0JCJU hV>CJhV> 9 0&P1h:pb[/ =!"#$% ^# 2 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH @`@ :?NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH VV  Heading 1$$$ & F @&^a$5>*@@  Heading 2$@&^>*RR  Heading 3$dh@&^`5aJHH  Heading 4$$@&^a$5>*bb  Heading 5$$$dd@&[$\$^a$5>*B* \ph3HH  Heading 6$$ & F@&a$5\V@V  Heading 7&$$ 0@&^`0a$5@@@  Heading 8$$@&a$5\F F  Heading 9 $$@&^a$>*DA`D Default Paragraph FontViV  Table Normal :V 44 la (k (No List ^R^ Body Text Indent 2 $ !0^`0a$4@4 Header  !4 @4 Footer  !PC"P Body Text Indent$^a$5\.)@1. Page NumberNS@BN Body Text Indent 3$^a$>BR> Body Text$a$ 6CJ]FTbF Block Text$p]^pa$HrH  Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJL^L Normal (Web)dd[$\$ B* ph3e HTML Preformatted7 2( Px 4 #\'*.25@9B*CJOJQJ^JaJphB'B Comment ReferenceCJaJ<<  Comment TextCJaJ4U4 Hyperlink >*phffPoP Default 7$8$H$OJQJ^J_HmH sH tH jj  Table Grid7:V0NN b\Body Text Indent 3 CharCJaJxOx  Colorful List - Accent 11 d^m$CJOJPJQJaJ*O* s0style45^JD@"D s List Paragraph "^m$PK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] p aa C "'+Z4';<=E:Y\lr(yІDFHJMPRTWY[]_cdfhl2 \ *$'"* .89<BRZ^VfNkvEGIKLNOQSUVXZ\^`abegk!!8@0(  B S  ?8@ R\HRnsz# #))----Z2b2^8g8?(?BB(C1CoFxFGGGGGG~~~~~~~~~~~~nqArjn?A //*1;1mQrQqquqyy~~~~~~~~~~~~nq3333333{p{pppppqqqq s sss6t7t8t:ttt u uvvUwVwwwyym{o{t|v|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'),JTTjlnq{p{pppppqqqq s sss6t7t8t:ttt u uvvUwVwwwyym{o{t|v|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'),JTTjlnqtXbdQ,jM _O(@J*hL8&b~,A'r}>:eO@ ^AbADx6( 5N?,z UKuRX$؁XR` ZbքU`${7bbdQ$)eIsJo$[t$~ڼ`^`o(.  ^ `hH.  L^ `LhH. x^x`hH. H^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(^`o(.^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(h^`OJQJo(hHhp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hH8^8`o(. ^`hH.  L^ `LhH.  ^ `hH. x^x`hH. HL^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(> ^`hH.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`OJQJo(p^p`OJQJ^Jo(o @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(P^P`OJQJ^Jo(o  ^ `OJQJo(0^`0o(.88^8`o(. L^`LhH.   ^ `hH.   ^ `hH. xLx^x`LhH. HH^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.p0p^p`0o(. ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.^`OJPJQJ^J.   ^ `hH.  L ^ `LhH. xx^x`hH. HH^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.p0p^p`0o(.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(.  L ^ `LhH. xx^x`hH. HH^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.0^`0o(. ^`hH.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.0^`0o(.^`o(.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(0^`0>*o(. ^`hH.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.^`o(.  ^ `hH.  L^ `LhH. x^x`hH. H^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. hh^h`OJQJo(88^8`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo(   ^ `OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o xx^x`OJQJo( HH^H`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo(0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(. ^`hH.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.XRXU`z U~>:Jo 5NAD8&7b _O Z$)eO@At,j~,A'J*tX&j`                                   <R                 f        s        "bv        ]b        è        rf               .%q       v ;                 Rv        j`                 ,]b                6        UuV,!B3a3 Q 9% 0Kqdv}Zw\a]kl0!xI!&)"h#$'$'~'9 (+aa+/T/ 0QD0{01_18V1c15x1a225]5Yl6s7h7.49c ?(?)?Se@ssAhB.CLCD{6ERE tE=xE`UF)[FG.HJ)lLXtM8ENb"Q6Q9Q+sSZS\b\5y\Z~\ p`0cth8kAk(lXlQm\:n)7obpMypxqE)v_wwBbw{wKBy']yVz|}bk~'b[\m] _5^,p[4k{$VL]frx'%ZITN/+WbV8~v;:V>9ݭt8zɰ+8.]Mݱ+";EVѴ'L%R5%E&f%P/59x1<fx:?=X,k;6CNcJWOsux&L~L N]&D& ^B0Z~~@L ()x}p@(@2h@@Unknown G* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * Arial5. *aTahoma?= * Courier NewCTimesNewRoman7.{ @Calibri;WingdingsA BCambria Math"1h&fF k@k@!4dG~G~ 2qHX?x2!xxAgendaSNPAEsnjdpd                 Oh+'0  4 @ L Xdlt|AgendaSNPAE Normal.dotmsnjdp9Microsoft Office Word@:@FF=@s`o@]"k՜.+,0 hp  University of Alaska@G~ Agenda Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F~D1Tablen